Stratocumulus clouds, March 4, 2018. 5:00 PM
Clouds First, Stephen Morton, March 4
Categories
- 2021 Fall (219)
- Admin (5)
- Flow Categories (1,007)
- Clouds (387)
- Altocumulus (60)
- Altocumulus Lenticularis (72)
- Altostratus (49)
- Atmospheric Optical Phenomena (7)
- Anticrepuscular Rays (1)
- Crepuscular Rays (4)
- Banner Cloud (1)
- Cirrocumulus (11)
- Cirrostratus (13)
- Cirrus (34)
- Contrail (9)
- Cumulonimbus (9)
- Cumulus (51)
- Cumulus Congestus (6)
- Foehn Cloud Wall (7)
- Fog (6)
- Kelvin-Helmholtz Waves (7)
- Mountain Wave (85)
- Nighttime (3)
- Nimbostratus (4)
- Radiatus (2)
- Stratocumulus (96)
- Stratus (14)
- Sunrise (24)
- Sunset (83)
- Undulatus (15)
- Combustion/Explosions (67)
- Fire: Partially Premixed/Turbulent Flames (35)
- Ignition (6)
- Premixed flame (4)
- Rubin's Tube (6)
- Sparks (9)
- Convective Cell (4)
- Ferrofluid (34)
- Fluid-Structure Interaction (15)
- Marangoni (30)
- Mixing (55)
- Nondiffusive (25)
- Turbulence (13)
- Multiphase (291)
- Foams and Soap Bubbles (46)
- Hydraulic Jump (5)
- Ice (12)
- Leidenfrost (13)
- Lensing (12)
- Liquids in Air (51)
- Rising Bubbles (30)
- Smoke and Fog (53)
- Soap Films (23)
- Splashes (74)
- Worthington Jet (27)
- Sprays (17)
- Surface Tension (42)
- Water Surface (30)
- NonNewtonian (47)
- Kaye Effect and Rope Coiling (14)
- Oobleck (22)
- Paint (5)
- Plumes and Drops (91)
- Buoyant (10)
- Negatively Buoyant (39)
- Rayleigh-Taylor Instability (52)
- Saffman-Taylor Instability (27)
- Vortexes (75)
- Bathtub Drain (4)
- Spiral Vortex View (19)
- Vortex Ring (38)
- Vortex Side View (21)
- Wakes, Jets, Shear (63)
- Waves (21)
- Clouds (387)
- Flow Vis Techniques (427)
- Chemiluminescence (29)
- Fluorescence (14)
- Marked Area (201)
- Laser Sheet (8)
- Particle Tracks (11)
- Refractive Index (118)
- Rheoscopic Fluid (10)
- Slow Motion (28)
- Thermal Emission (45)
- Thin Film Interference (21)
- Time Lapse (9)
- Wall Shear (8)
- flow visualization (1)
- Media (757)
- No category (93)
- z Class & Assignment (2,185)
- 2013 (278)
- 2013 Spring Clouds First (47)
- 2013 Spring Clouds Second (46)
- 2013 Spring Get Wet (48)
- 2013 Spring Team First (46)
- 2013 Spring Team Second (45)
- 2013 Spring Team Third (46)
- 2014 (254)
- 2014 Clouds First (43)
- 2014 Clouds Second (42)
- 2014 Get Wet (43)
- 2014 Team First (43)
- 2014 Team Second (41)
- 2014 Team Third (42)
- 2015 (247)
- 2015 Clouds First (42)
- 2015 Clouds Second (41)
- 2015 Get Wet (41)
- 2015 Team First (41)
- 2015 Team Second (41)
- 2015 Team Third (41)
- 2016 (275)
- 2016 Best of Web (47)
- 2016 Clouds First (38)
- 2016 Clouds Second (38)
- 2016 Get Wet (38)
- 2016 Team First (38)
- 2016 Team Second (38)
- 2016 Team Third (38)
- 2018 Fall (235)
- 2018 Fall Best of Web (36)
- 2018 Fall Clouds First (33)
- 2018 Fall Clouds Second (33)
- 2018 Fall Get Wet (34)
- 2018 Fall Team First (34)
- 2018 Fall Team Second (32)
- 2018 Fall Team Third (33)
- 2018 Spring (423)
- 2019 Fall (304)
- 2019 Extra Images (3)
- 2019 Fall Best of Web (44)
- 2019 Fall Clouds First (43)
- 2019 Fall Clouds Second (43)
- 2019 Fall Get Wet (43)
- 2019 Fall Team First (43)
- 2019 Fall Team Second (43)
- 2019 Fall Team Third (42)
- 2020 Fall (172)
- 2020 Fall Best of Web (29)
- 2020 Fall Clouds First (29)
- 2020 Fall Clouds Second (20)
- 2020 Fall Image-Video 1 (29)
- 2020 Fall Image-Video 2 (29)
- 2020 Fall Image-Video 3 (28)
- 2020 Fall Image-Video 4 (9)
- 2013 (278)
22 Comments. Leave new
This looks like a painting, very beautiful
I like how you focused the image on just the clouds. However, it all seems to blend together and is a little blurry. Better focus of the camera and contrast might help with that. However, great idea!
The silky texture of the clouds look very aetherial. It would make an awesome desktop background. You could play with the brightness / saturation / contrast a bit more to highlight the detail, and maybe improve the sharpness while taking the picture. Unless the clouds were naturally less detailed, of course!
Effective visualization. I wonder if increased focus would resolve more of the cloud physics.
I like the visible details with how close up the image is.
The contrast between the white and blue colors make the image visually appealing. I like how the white of the clouds look like a paint brush streak across the blue sky. Overall, well done!
The angle is interesting. Does look like a sort of a painting. Simple and straight to the point. I like it.
I like how fluid the image is, there are no distracting elements, and the colors are all very subtle and similar with a little bit of texture.
Great image, the details of the clouds are visible. I would consider increasing the contrast so that the different cloud elements are more easily distinguishable. However, the slightly washed out colors do make it resemble a painting.
Great image with a nice focus. I would suggest playing around with the color balance a little.
This looks interesting and is filled with soft colors that sort of imitate an impressionist painting.
The clouds are really interesting – appear very fluffy, almost like a painting.
Cool choice of cropping, this image is one of few that does not include a foreground, which is cool
I like the clouds in this. The framing is nice. I wish the colors were less muted.
The stratocumulus clouds in this image are quite beautiful and make for a pastoral-esque cloud image.
Interesting layering and color distribution. The cropping is interesting, but I like it.
Nice clouds, but kindof hard to see whats happening. I would suggest increasing the contrast to see more detail.
I like the way that there is a strong diagonal that the clouds follow.
A higher contrast might help, but this has a nice effect.
I think adding more contrast would really help bring out details in the clouds. I really like the pastel-like colors in the image.
Nice job It looks like a watercolor.
I like the cropping and rotation in the image a lot, but there’s not much contrast going on.